Home Fetal Monitoring and One Devoted Grandfather

February 25, 2015 6 comments

This month we are honored to have a guest blog by someone who knew all too well the story about stillbirth – she has lived it her entire life as she watched her father push forward his passion for preventing these needless tragedies.  And then she had her own brush with tragedy……. read on….

Guest Blog by Catherine Alford

Jason Collins and babies

The Alford Twins – Nicknamed Bean and Beanette long before their birth, and their proud Grandpa Jason!

I’ve been hearing all of your stories – your stories of loss, love, sadness, and eventual triumph – my entire life. My dad, Dr. Jason Collins, started his research on umbilical cord accidents when I was only 5 years old. In fact, I was so used to him staying up late every night looking at heart rate strips that I used to draw him pictures of them and tape them to his bedroom wall so he’d see them before he went to bed. It was far more exciting than drawing him stick figures, and he thoroughly enjoyed them.

My dad has been trying to solve this problem, this terrible, preventable problem of umbilical cord accidents for such a long time. It has been his life’s work, his obsession, and his amazing gift to medicine. When I was a kid, we had a phone in our kitchen connected to the wall with a really long cord. This was back before cell phones of course. Every time other physicians would come over to the house, my dad would try to explain what happens to a baby in utero with a UCA using the phone cord. He would wrap that cord around his arm, twisting it and turning it, trying to explain. “Torsion!” “A true knot!” These moments, these lessons, slowly seeped their way into my mind. I knew at a young age that having a full term healthy baby was truly a miracle.

Needless to say, when I got pregnant for the first time, I was nervous. Very nervous. I was living abroad at the time away from my family and away from American healthcare. When my husband and I went in for an early ultrasound at 5 weeks to confirm the pregnancy, we got the shock of our lives and found out we were having twins. After the shock wore off and I had time to compose myself, the first person I told was of course, my dad.

“Dad,” I said, “You’re not going to believe this, but I’m having twins.” His immediate response was, “Oh cool! Twins are so fun to look at on ultrasound.”

My dad was there for me every step of my pregnancy. I obsessively e-mailed him pictures of every single ultrasound, even when my twins were just tiny little circles, even when he and I both knew there was nothing he could do to save them if something went wrong.

I wish I could say I enjoyed my pregnancy, but I couldn’t. Whether it was a blessing or a curse, I was fully aware of the risks. I knew about the unthinkable, the unfortunate reality that many of you have faced in your lives. To top it off, carrying two babies at once meant more risks, more chances for the kids running out of room, more opportunities for cord compression. I tried to stay calm and tried to enjoy it, but it was hard. Both my husband, who is a medical student, and I just wanted to make it to the end and hold our babies in our arms – alive.

cat and jason

Cat and her Dad peeking at the tiwns!

I moved back to the United States during my second trimester with plenty enough time for my dad to spoil me with steak dinners while my poor husband studied for a massively important medical school board exam. I received countess ultrasounds both from my regular physician, my maternal fetal medicine doctor, and my dad. I knew that if anything bad were to happen, I would know about it.

I know my dad though, and I know he was nervous about my pregnancy even though he tried not to show it. When I told him how happy I was to make it to the viability point of 24 weeks, he just calmly said, “Let’s just try to make it to 28.” When I told him I was having one boy and one girl, he let out the funniest laugh, which I got on video. He was slowly getting attached to the babies as a grandfather and yet remaining detached as a physician observing what could potentially be a problem.

At 30 weeks, my dad gave me a heart rate monitor so he could monitor the babies’ heart rates remotely, like he has for many of his Pregnancy Institute patients the past two decades. Every night, I would monitor my daughter for 30 minutes and my son for 30 minutes, sending my dad photos of the strips every five minutes. I had to put up with his commentary of course. When I had a contraction he’d say, “Yeah. That looked like a good one!”

At around 34 weeks, he started noticing a bit of cord compression on my daughter’s strip. He monitored me even closer, all while I was being seen by my regular physician every week. Throughout the day, I counted kicks, making sure I could feel both babies.

Then, the morning I hit 35 weeks, it happened.

I counted my daughter’s kicks but I couldn’t feel my son. I shot straight up in bed and yelled at my husband hysterically: “I can’t feel him!”

I went straight to the guest room to get attached to the heart rate monitor while my husband listened for his heart beat with his stethoscope. A wave of relief hit us when he found it. He was there. Alive. He just wasn’t moving.

I hopped in the bathtub since both babies got really active in the warm water. Again, my daughter kicked around happily but nothing from my son. After I ate a pop tart to try to wake him up and still nothing happened, I told my husband we were going to the hospital.

I didn’t wait for an okay from my doctor. I didn’t hesitate. I knew from hearing all of your stories that time was of the essence. I called my doctor to tell her I was on my way, then I called my dad. When I got there, I was contracting every 7 minutes and in labor. I hadn’t even noticed because I was so focused on trying to feel my son kick.

At the exact moment my doctor told me that I was going to be having the babies that day, my dad was texting me frantically ordering me to stay at the hospital (my husband sent him a picture of the heart rate strip, and he knew it was time!) I was able to calmly call him and say, “Yes, Dad, my doctor agrees! We’re having the babies now!”

On March 23, 2014 at 11:35 A.M. my son was born alive and healthy. A minute later, my daughter was born also alive and healthy. After a bit of a rough start and two weeks in the NICU, they came home with us. They’re now almost one, crawling all over the house and all over each other. They love to FaceTime with my Dad. They know his voice and try to clobber the phone when they see his face on it.

I know I’m fortunate because my story has a happy ending, and I’m confident that happy ending came because of my nightly remote FHR monitoring.

I also had the world’s best doctor and the world’s foremost expert on UCAs watching my every move during my pregnancy, and I’m especially blessed because that same doctor is my dad.


Catherine Alford  is the daughter of Drs. Jason & Candace Collins and is a well rounded professional in the digital space who is best known for her ability to write about difficult topics in an engaging way. With a formal background in American History, Catherine worked for years as an historian before she began to focus her attention on her love of blogging and building online businesses. Currently, she is a professional blogger for numerous websites and is actively growing her online reach.  Read her blog – Budget Blonde.  Her most important job however is Mom to her beautiful twin son and daughter.

Do We Really Need OBs?

February 1, 2015 3 comments

by Lindsey J. Wimmer, MSN, CPNP, CPLC

Looking at many of the trends in obstetric care of recent years, it appears that obstetricians aren’t really needed.  The increasingly-popular desire toward home deliveries further supports this point.  There are many rules that tell our OBs exactly what to do, when to do it, and how to do it, so it seems that anyone who can follow directions should be able to perform their duties.  We have turned obstetric care into a recipe.  As long as the ‘chef’ doesn’t stray from the recipe, all will be great.  Right?

Clearly, I’m being sarcastic and exaggerating in the process.  But the thought has crossed my mind recently.  I sympathize with the obstetricians who are often caught in a difficult spot between their patients’ desires, their medical opinion, their Hippocratic obligation (“primum non nocere” – first do no harm), and the rules from hospital, professional organizations or insurance companies.  Their ability to do what they are trained to do and that they believe is in the best interest of all involved must often be compromised.  The best example of this phenomenon at the moment is the restriction of delivery before 39 weeks gestation.

complianceIf you’re not familiar with this movement, the short version is that physicians are now prohibited from scheduling a delivery before 39 weeks and 0 days unless one of the specific criteria is present. Even at 39 weeks if there are no cervical changes that target moves out as far as 42 weeks.

I  was trained, as were most obstetricians currently in practice that ‘full term’ was 37-40 weeks gestation.  Suddenly, that definition has been changed to 39 weeks by ACOG.  Yet, I have not seen any research to show a solid reason for this.  Yes – many babies have fewer complications at later gestations, but this is not an absolute fact and I don’t understand the benefit of changing the definition.  (The fact that it was changed without solid research is particularly irritating to me because they often tell stillbirth advocates that changes to practice cannot be based on provider experience/knowledge or anecdotal evidence – yet that is exactly what they have used in this case).

When I first heard of this initiative, it was presented as an education effort to reduce convenience deliveries before 39 weeks.  It’s safe to say that the vast majority of people understand that it is not good practice to induce labor because the mother is tired of being pregnant, she wants a specific doctor to deliver her child, or it works better in the physician or family’s schedule.  But I also know that many deliveries that were scheduled before 39 weeks were for reasons other than convenience – including my own 4 children.  In my opinion, best practice lies somewhere between convenience and the specific criteria listed (as I can think of many conditions that place the baby at risk that are not represented in that list).  The list of exceptions to the 39 week rule that will “buy your ticket” to early delivery consists mainly of maternal conditions such as hypertensive disorders, oligohydraminos, prior classical cesarean delivery, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, premature rupture of membranes, and cholestasis.  However, indicators of fetal distress such as decreased fetal movement or even previous history of stillbirth are absent from the list and there are others we believe should be considered in these decisions.

It is a great example of how a simple and good idea can be taken to an extreme.

Many organizations jumped on board with this idea since 2008 – including ACOG (professional organization of obstetricians), AWOHNN (professional organization of women’s health nurses), ACNM (professional organization of nurse midwives), March of Dimes, JCAHO (hospital accrediting organization), many insurance organizations and others.

There are financial consequences for providers and/or hospitals that do not follow this guideline.  The Leapfrog Group, a coalition of big corporate health-care purchasers, in 2009 began asking hospitals around the nation to report their rate of early term induced births that weren’t medically necessary according to the extremely short list of approved “medical necessity”. Beginning Jan. 1, 2013 United Healthcare, the nation’s largest private health insurer, began paying hospitals more money if they take steps to limit early deliveries and show a drop in their rates. Insurer Aetna is funding a March of Dimes program that helps hospitals adopt implementation policies, and it is using claims data to advise newly pregnant women of the importance of 39 weeks in the womb. (Of course this data does not even discuss the potential or rate of stillbirth.) Aetna asks hospitals to report their rate of earlier elective deliveries, and it highlights hospitals that meet Leapfrog targets on its website.  The hospital accrediting organization, JCAHO implemented ‘quality standards’ that requires measurement and tracking of early so called elective delivery rates.  This in and of itself isn’t a big deal – but noticeably absent is a quality standard that tracks and measures the numbers of stillbirths in any given hospital. Hospitals take JCAHO standards very seriously because federal funding (medicare/medicaid) funding is tied to their accreditation.

This all appears understandable because after all – who doesn’t want healthier babies?  NICUs are scary places and everyone would rather their baby not ever need their care.  In addition, the care provided in NICUs is extremely expensive.  If we can keep babies out of NICUs, it will mean babies are healthier and we save millions in health care dollars.

Sounds like a no-brainer.

One of the major problems with is that we are assuming every pregnancy can and should continue until the mom goes into labor naturally after 39 weeks.  However, we know that that we have significantly lowered the fetal death rate, the neonatal death rate, the birth injury rate, and maternal morbidity and mortality rates by utilizing the technologies that have been developed over the last 50-60 years.  Much of that happened because we were able to deliver babies before they or their mothers suffered serious or fatal consequences.  It is not routine care to look for fetal distress without other symptoms.  That means there could be a lot of babies in distress and we are making them wait for delivery.  In these cases, the NICU might be their best option for survival!  NICU care can be a wonderful thing.

We’re also assuming that every baby born between 37 and 39 weeks will need to be cared for in the NICU.  This is not the case. Millions of babies are born at that gestation around the world without needing any extra care or interventions.  Even if they do need help, it may only be for a few hours or days.

I was taught that if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.  Where’s the catch?  In this case, the catch is that sometimes our obstetricians are saving our babies’ lives by removing them from an intrauterine environment that is no longer the optimal place for them to be.  It is true that some of these babies may need NICU care after delivery.  But is that the worst possible outcome?  I know thousands of stillbirth families that would have gladly spent time in a NICU giving their child a chance at life if the other option was to be planning their child’s funeral.  We must keep in perspective ALL potential outcomes of our decisions.

This is the balancing act that obstetricians must deal with on a daily basis – particularly in earlier gestations.  A mother’s health or the baby’s status must be very compromised for the physician to feel delivery is the best option at 24 weeks gestation (as an example).  But until recently, that decision at 37-38 weeks was much easier for the doctors to make.  Now – it has another layer of difficulty because of the scrutiny they will endure for their clinical decisions.

I am routinely hearing stories about families who make a decision with their obstetrician that delivery is the best option, yet they are turned away from the hospital because they don’t meet the far too short list of criteria for an ‘early’ delivery.  The decision-making process has been taken out of the hands of the patients and the providers.  This is wrong on so many levels – both clinical and ethical.  We need the people who have been involved in the pregnancy all along, who are evaluating the circumstances, and who will be most affected to be making the decisions.  Not ‘experts’ who are thinking about general populations or insurance companies thinking about their expenses and their shareholders.

aj_stop_sign_angled_clip_art_18120We also hear about women who go into labor at 36-39 weeks.  When they present to the hospital, their labor is immediately stopped.  This would not have been an issue just a few years ago.  Most troubling is when the labor is stopped, the family is sent home, and they return in the following days or weeks to deliver a stillborn child.   It appears that these pregnancies had reached the end of their ability to sustain the baby, yet we intervened for a rule that was created without adequate research or reasoning.

Medicine is not a cookbook.  Every person and every situation is different.  Sweeping rules that remove autonomy from the patient and disregard the professional opinions of the providers are asking for trouble.  And that is what has happened.  Data is beginning to emerge that these hard-stop rules are working in regard to the number of babies who are delivered before 39 weeks, the number of babies who are admitted to NICUs, and the amount of money spent on NICU care.  However, the data also indicates that the number of stillborn babies born at 37-39 weeks is increasing.  Other victims of this new rule are babies that are stillborn after 39 weeks, but induction wasn’t allowed because mom didn’t have sufficient cervical changes to qualify for delivery.  These are extremely viable babies that we have the ability to save!

Patients have the right to refuse any medical treatment they don’t want for ANY reason.  This is well-established principle of medical ethics and honored time and time again.  We ensure they are counselled about the pros and cons of all decisions.  If a patient is making an informed decision – we must honor that (even if we disagree or would not choose the same for ourselves).  However, patients don’t have the same level of control over their health if they choose a medical treatment that the hospital, professional organization, or insurance company doesn’t want to happen.  We should treat it the same as we do refusal of treatment.  Educate the family of the pros and cons of ALL options, and honor their decision.

The “39 week rule” is a good idea taken to an extreme with significant, unintended consequences. 

I have learned of conversations our obstetricians have with their colleagues around the world will hear about what is happening with this issue in the US.  The international OB community’s first reaction is disbelief that it is really being implemented in such a way.  When they are reassured that it is true, they are flabbergasted.   It seems absurd to limit the expertise of the medical professionals.  I agree.

In adopting this practice, our medical establishments have chosen mortality over morbidity.  They find it acceptable for more babies to die in utero in order to reduce the number of babies who need NICU care.

  • It bothers me that our society is letting this happen.
  • It bothers me that families have been unethically removed from the decision-making process.
  • It bothers me that our providers have their hands tied when it is their practices and licenses at risk.
  • It bothers me that we don’t value the impact of stillbirth on families enough to end this ‘rule’ immediately.

We absolutely need obstetricians and their expertise.  I, for one, want my doctor and I to make medical decisions for my family together.  We should all have that right.


Does this sound like your story?  Were you told your delivery must wait until 39 weeks (or later)? Did you spontaneously go into labor between 32-39 weeks and have your labor stopped? If so, we’d like to hear your story whether your story ended joyfully or otherwise.  Click here to share your story.  Stories submitted will NOT be posted on any website and will only be used anonymously.  

A blog about blogs

January 10, 2015 10 comments

by Lindsey J. Wimmer, MSN, CPNP, CPLC 

I feel the need to speak up for stillbirth families in regard to the multitude of blogs, articles, and beliefs that circulate about us as grieving families and about pregnancy and childbirth in general.  The judgmental tone of much of this information makes it clear that these individuals have an agenda.  Because of this, I usually try to ignore them or give them the benefit of the doubt.  However, recently, I have read and heard several that are incredibly insulting due to the tone and ‘advice’ given to women such as myself.  I’m not sure when pregnancy and childbirth care became such a polarizing and political issue, but stillbirth families have a voice that needs to be heard, too.

To the authors (who shall remain unnamed – you know who you are): I can’t tell you how happy I am for you that your pregnancies and deliveries have gone as you hoped, expected, and prayed.  I am thrilled that you were not confronted with needing to make some of the most gut-wrenching decisions that we are ever asked to make as part of your childbirth experience.   I am genuinely happy that you have never experienced the pain of being told your child has died in your womb and that you will soon be giving birth to your dead child.  I don’t wish that on anyone and I have a special place in my heart for those who, like me, have lived that experience as part of our parenting story.  You cannot fathom what it is like to walk in our shoes.  This is not an insult.  I truly believe that it is impossible to have enough empathy for parents who have lost a child until we have lived it because it is a place so awful that our bodies, minds, and spirits will not let us go there until we have no choice.  I don’t expect you to understand where we are coming from.  I only ask you to respect that and don’t try to pretend you understand.

One thing I would like to try and explain is that when you minimize our loss or losses like ours, you minimize the love we have for our children.  It is condescending and offensive.  We are often referred to the wisdom, beauty, and perfectionism of God or Mother Nature or similar higher powers.  You are telling us that God believed that your child was worthy to live, but mine wasn’t.  You’re telling me that Mother Nature likes you more than she likes me.

Yes – I am now a statistic.  But I am a person.  It is less painful to look at us as statistics because there is safety and comfort in numbers. It allows you to keep us and our emotions at a distance.  Minimizing how often this happens or how it should impact our lives isn’t helpful.

I feel like you (and the countless others who write similar articles) have good intentions in trying to educate the masses and encourage women to have the type of experiences you were able to have or you have watched others have.  Unfortunately, we have learned the hard way that pregnancy and childbirth often do not proceed as we planned, hoped, dreamed, and prayed.  We USED to want the same things you want.  But sometimes we make decisions that allow us to follow our beliefs and hopes for the best outcomes as we define them.   Sometimes we must sacrifice one desired outcome for another.  These are choices we make every day as human beings.

I may be grieving, but I am not devoid of common sense or incapable of cognitive activity.  When you do not understand my comments or disagree with me, I am not “hysterical”, “crazy”, or “unstable”.  My experience has given me a different perspective.  That doesn’t make me wrong.  Don’t tell me my behavior is understandable.  I refuse to apologize for grieving my child the best I know how.

As part of this process, I will obtain the type of care I NEED for my physical and emotional health now and for future pregnancies.  If this is not the type of care you prefer or deem as necessary, that is fine with me.  I don’t expect you to know the anxiety in my head, the physical pain in my heart, or the constant fear I live with.  These things impact my well-being, too.  And I will advocate for myself and my child to minimize ANY threat to my health or that of my children.  Do not judge me for that.

And yes – I will tell everyone I love about stillbirth and about how they can reduce their risk.  I am not a grim reaper.  I am not dwelling in my grief.  I am simply telling my story and trying to protect those around me from the pain I know too well.

We are not looking for someone or something to blame.  We are simply trying to process this major life event.  In many cases, we are trying to learn how to prevent it from happening again.  People do the same thing with heart disease, cancer, mental illness, diabetes, and countless other conditions every day.  Should we also be offended at commercials encouraging us to get mammograms, quit smoking, get our cholesterol tested, etc?

We are searching for an explanation.  This is a natural part of the grieving process.  We don’t expect our providers to be super-human and we don’t expect an explanation to land our on our step with a neat bow on top.  But we would like more effort to learn what is happening to our otherwise healthy babies and how to prevent it.   Where would we be if our health professionals had thrown up their hands and said AIDS just happens and we can’t do anything about it?  It may not be possible to save every single baby.  We get that.  But more than 3 million babies every year around the world gives us a LOT of room for improvement.

A common suggestion is for us to trust Mother Nature.  We used to.  But, unfortunately, it failed us.  We wish we could trust that our bodies will do what is best.  But it is a struggle to ask our hearts to trust a process that that led to such heartache.  Why are we supposed to accept stillbirth as a natural process?  Cancer, heart disease, and every health condition I can think of is a “natural” process.  However, I appreciate that decades of resources have been focused on reducing the impact of these diseases. We do not blindly accept that cancer or heart disease happens without significant effort to prevent and treat them.

Until we have better answers, treatment, and prevention for stillbirth, I will support the stillbirth families and the health professionals working tirelessly to reduce the incidence of these tragedies.  These are individuals who recognize the value of our babies within our families and within our society. That gives me the most hope.  My hopes, dreams, and desires may look different than yours.  I’m ok with that.  I just ask you grant me the same courtesy.

Umbilical Cord FAQ

December 6, 2014 7 comments

By Lindsey Wimmer, MSN, CPNP, CPLC

Umbilical cord accidents continue to be the number one topic I hear about in emails and phone calls from pregnant or grieving families.  The reasons for this are many.  I do not claim to be an expert on umbilical cord issues, and the topic has been poorly researched.  However, I struggle with the ‘facts’ that are often used without telling the whole truth.  Here is my understanding of the most common questions or comments I hear regarding cord accidents.

The Whole Truth

us 1It is true that a significant number of babies are born with cords around their necks and the majority of them do not show any signs of distress.  This does NOT mean, however, that cords cannot cause problems!   To tell someone that cords can’t be problematic because they aren’t ALWAYS problematic is misleading.

Not EVERY person who smokes tobacco will die of lung cancer.  Does this mean smoking doesn’t cause lung cancer?  Of course not.  Does it mean we don’t need to tell people who smoke of the dangers?  Of course not.

If your baby was born with an umbilical cord issue and your baby is happy and healthy, PLEASE count your blessings and consider yourself fortunate to have landed on that side of the statistics.  We are not all so lucky.  Most of all, please don’t say my baby’s cause of death isn’t significant or worth worrying about just because it didn’t happen to your baby.

Should I worry about the ‘nuchal’ cord?

When we hear about cord issues, most people think about or are talking about nuchal cords.  This is when the umbilical cord is wrapped around the baby’s neck.  That placement alone is not necessarily the problem.  It is a problem if it is wrapped tightly.  However – not for the reason most people think.  A tightly wrapped nuchal cord is not a concern because of the baby’s neck (before birth, the baby does not get oxygen through the trachea into the lungs).  It is a concern because of the compression that is put on the cord itself.  The umbilical cord IS how the baby gets oxygen before birth.  So – a nuchal cord that is tight enough to restrict blood flow through the cord between the placenta and the baby puts the baby’s oxygen supply at risk.  However – the same is true for any position of the baby and umbilical cord that compresses the cord and reduces blood flow.  This can occur around a limb, around the baby’s body, as a knot in the umbilical cord, with multiple nuchal cords or wraps, as a poor insertion point into the placenta, between the baby’s body and mom’s, and so forth.  Nuchal cords get the most attention, but that is just one type of potential cord issue.

My doctor says cord accidents don’t cause problems and then my doctor said my baby was stillborn due to a cord accident.

I am the first to admit that the research into umbilical cord issues and how to manage them is lacking.  Much more is needed.  But the problem is compounded by the medical community not even being able to agree if this is a legitimate cause of death.  The part that is most frustrating to me is that many providers use both of the above statements when it fits the situation.

According to the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN) studies, 11% of all stillbirths were determined to be caused by umbilical cord issues.  By their own description, this is probably a low number because they had very strict conditions for coming to this conclusion and required definitive pathologic evidence of such.

It can be extremely distressful and frustrating to parents to hear during the pregnancy that umbilical cords don’t cause problems and then after the pregnancy that the cause of their baby’s death was an umbilical cord accident.  We can’t have it both ways.   This gives the appearance that providers either don’t know about the issue or they are taking the “easy” way out.  (Meaning it’s easier to reassure parents and play the odds during the pregnancy.)  It’s also easier after a stillbirth to provide an “answer” that is easy for families to understand and accept.  The belief that “nothing can be done about umbilical cord issues” doesn’t help because it allows providers to use the line that “these things just happen”.

If cord accidents DO happen, then why are we told they don’t?   If they DON’T happen, then why are we told they do?

Why should I say anything about a cord issue?

Many families find out accidentally or after the fact that their baby had an umbilical cord issue.  Most providers I talk to tell me that they will not tell families about the issue.  If they do tell them or the family finds out, the provider will minimize their level of concern.  Why?

Most providers say they ‘reassure’ their patients that cords don’t cause problems because they don’t want the mothers to worry and they can’t do anything about it anyway.

First – your job is not to keep me thinking that everything in pregnancy is bubblegum and unicorns.  Your job is to assess me and my baby and provide your professional recommendations about how to protect us both from harm.

Second – why aren’t you the ones asking for studies to be done that would help you have treatment options??  Our medical community should be leading the charge in demanding we learn more.  The advancements we have made in the last few decades in almost every area of medicine are incredible.  Why isn’t stillbirth (and cord accidents in particular) one of them?  The lacks of research and treatment options directly affect you, your patients, and how you practice.

Third – If you don’t know what to do about a condition or don’t feel like there are good options, tell us that!  We have the right to know what is going on with our bodies and our babies.  Let us be a part of that conversation.  Other areas of medicine don’t get away with this.


Cords don’t get tight with labor or cause the baby to be in distress

Umbilical cords can become taught during labor depending on many forces including the length and position of the umbilical cord and the position of the baby.  All the ways a cord can be compressed or compromised during the pregnancy can happen during delivery as well.  Any change in physiologic status can cause fetal distress – including hypoxia secondary to cord compression.  Not every baby who experiences distress during labor has a cord issue, but many do.  There are other causes of distress as well, but that does not mean cords aren’t one of them.

I personally had the experience of watching my baby demonstrate this effect.  While on a fetal heart monitor and having an ultrasound completed, we were able to see my baby’s position compress the umbilical cord.  Within about 8-10 seconds, my baby’s heart rate started to decelerate.  When she moved and the cord compression was relieved, her heart rate returned to normal.  Once her heart rate began to decelerate and she was not able to relieve the compression enough for her to recover, she was immediately delivered.  Because of this experience, I believe 100% that cord compression can be a cause of fetal distress.

Cesarean section is the only cure for a nuchal cord.

A newer question I have been asked is if a C-section is required to save a baby when a nuchal cord is identified.  I’m going to discuss this in terms of all cord issues (not just nuchal for the reasons mentioned above).   A C-section does not necessarily prevent cord issues, and it is certainly not the only way to reduce or manage cord complications.  There are situations where a provider feels this gives the mom and baby the best chance of positive outcomes. I am in support of any decision made with the family for those reasons.   I also believe vaginal deliveries are possible when cord issues are present.  In this case, knowledge about the issue, close fetal monitoring, and access to emergency care can help provide reassurance and warning about emerging symptoms.

There are many, many complex factors that must be evaluated when making the decision to have any surgical procedure.  I am not a fan of surgery whenever possible, but I also firmly believe that surgery is not the worst thing that can happen to someone.  This is simply another treatment modality that can be evaluated and considered.  Sometimes we must choose the lesser of evils.

Umbilical cord accidents don’t happen very often.

This is a statement made only by one who has never been affected.

And I would like to know what your definition is of the word “often”.

Stillbirth in general occurs 26,000 times every year in the United States.  If we use the SCRN numbers of 11% of stillbirths being caused by umbilical cord accidents, that would indicate that 2,860 babies will be stillborn this year due to umbilical cord accidents.  That is more than the number of SIDS deaths per year.  That is significant.

And these are the prenatal deaths.  What about the babies with umbilical cord accidents that only survive minutes or days?   What about the babies who develop cerebral palsy or other conditions as a result of the hypoxia suffered during an umbilical cord accident?

Which leads me back to where we began – we need more research to understand, manage, and prevent this cause of poor pregnancy outcomes.

Click here for previous related posts.

What is IUGR?

November 10, 2014 5 comments

by Lindsey Wimmer, RN, MSN, CPNP, CPLC

Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) is receiving a lot of attention recently as it relates to perinatal loss. I am very encouraged by this and the promising studies that are being done.  A recent video has been circulating through social media that highlights the issue.

I’ve been getting many questions from parents about what IUGR actually IS.  I think it’s a very important question.

The most important thing we need to understand about IUGR is that is it a symptom, not a diagnosis.  

Providers will often provide this as a diagnosis if there is a poor outcome in a pregnancy or even identify it as a cause of death.  Being small does not, in itself, post a lethal problem.  But WHY a baby is small very well could be a serious problem.

Studies have indicated that more than half of all stillborn babies are growth restricted. This tells me that these babies had issues going on through the pregnancy that were limiting the baby’s ability to develop and grow appropriately – and, ultimately to survive.

Growth restriction, by definition, requires us to recognize that a baby’s growth pattern is not following expected norms.  In pediatrics, we do this with every single well-child visit from birth to adulthood.  If a child is at the 75th percentile for his/her age and is consistently at that mark, we consider that appropriate growth.  However, if a child is usually at the 75th percentile and is suddenly down to the 25th percentile – we are going to be investigating because that is a significant change.  Growth charts can be utilized for fetal growth in the same way – and usually are when IUGR is suspected and identified during a pregnancy.  The problem is when a diaghnosis of IUGR is made from a single assessment.  From a single point in time, it is not feasible to identify if a baby measuring at the 25th percentile is acceptable or not.  It depends on what the baby has done in the past, but we often don’t have that information.

Most providers and facilities have identified trigger points at the 10th percentile or 5th percentile.  If a baby is under those marks, they may be diagnosed with IUGR.  This can be problematic because it may mean that we are concerned about a baby that is naturally a smaller person OR it may be that we don’t catch a baby that is very sick until it progresses to this extreme.  It is more appropriate to consider a baby “appropriate for gestational age” (AGA), “small for gestational age” (SGA) or “large for gestational age” (LGA) rather than IUGR if we are only looking at data from one assessment  These terms simply describe the child’s size without indicating if it is a concern or not.  However, it is important to remember that any of these babies could ALSO be growth restricted – but we need more information to know.  Once a baby is born, if we identify growth restriction (known as ‘failure to thrive’ in the pediatric setting), we will begin looking into potential causes.  We look at the sources of the baby’s nutrition, the baby’s anatomy and physical health, the baby’s behaviors and patterns, the baby’s environment, and more.  The baby’s size is considered a symptom – not a final diagnosis.  We may not be able to directly affect the baby’s growth, but we can address the underlying cause (in most cases) and indirectly improve growth.  The growth pattern is simply another vital sign that indicates how well the baby is doing.

This isn’t always the approach to baby’s growth (or restricted growth) in obstetrics.  Any baby diagnosed with IUGR should be having serial ultrasound measurements and further testing to identify the cause of the limited growth and the baby’s tolerance of the issues.  Examples could include placental concerns, restricted blood flow through the umbilical cord, infection, or genetic or anatomical abnormalities. This information gives the obstetrical providers information about how to manage the pregnancy moving forward.

Probably my biggest frustration with IUGR is that in ‘healthy’ pregnancies, it is only looked for by measuring fundal height (the tape measure of mom’s ‘bump’). This method has been noted in literature to be faulty and neither sensitive or specific.  But it continues to be the standard of care because it is easy and inexpensive.  I am very concerned, however, that this practice keeps us from identifying babies that are struggling under our radar and we lost a chance to intervene and help them survive and thrive. The technology exists for ultrasound measurements to be taken regularly throughout the pregnancy to better assess baby’s growth.

Many stillbirth families are told that their baby died of IUGR, yet they did not have any idea this was a concern before the baby had died.  Further, they aren’t given any information about WHY their baby had IUGR.  These are significant omissions that could have implications for parental grief, management of and health of subsequent pregnancies, or for public health stillbirth prevention efforts.

Stillbirth – a description, not a diagnosis

September 14, 2014 4 comments

This spring, Star Legacy Foundation held our first essay contest! Potential entrants were encouraged to send in an essay explaining what they would like researchers and health care providers to know about their stillbirth experience and what they have learned in their grief.

Jackie Sondrol submitted the winning entry. Her essay was printed in the syllabus for Stillbirth Summit 2014 in June and we are pleased to share it with you again here. Her words speak to many of us.

Thank you to everyone who participated. We hope to share the other entries in future issues.

We wish Jackie hadn’t joined our ‘club’ just as we wish none of us had. But, we are certainly grateful to have Jackie’s passion, dedication, and inspiration working with us to prevent stillbirth.


Stillbirth – a description, not a diagnosis. It is only after influential organizations reach this simple conclusion that we will move forward in research and eliminate this word from 26,000 families’ mouths annually.

I’ve had many thoughts over the past seven months since my son, Aiden, was born silently into this world but the one thought that keeps circling back is; Why?

• Why didn’t I know this was a possible outcome in pregnancy?
• Why didn’t I have the same level of care as an acquaintance of mine that was considered high risk only because she was over the age of 35?
• Why didn’t I have more testing as part of my routine care to monitor my baby’s well-being?
• Why does a mother have to experience a loss in order to receive better care?

All of these questions hold a lot of weight but combined they have the power to change a course of treatment or care but it shouldn’t have to come to this. It’s time providers take accountability for their level of care and work towards preventing/managing risks associated with stillbirth.

I’ve thought about the risk factors associated with stillbirth a dozen times. I didn’t have any; except now that my baby has been stillborn, I have one risk factor that makes me at risk for a stillbirth and not just 3% like I was before but according to one study; an increased risk up to ten fold. Why then, if every expectant mother has the same risk of having a stillborn, wouldn’t every expectant patient be considered high risk? If we do, in fact, have no indicators that a baby is at risk for stillbirth, then why isn’t a higher level of care given to the fragile condition of the baby in the womb and the expectant mother?

I believe; they are looking in the wrong place. The risk factors give providers a guideline to determine if certain women may be at a higher risk than others but, it seems that more often than not, the baby is the one that needs to have their own set of ‘guidelines’ to be monitored as well. How do we prevent/manage something if we aren’t even taking the time to look for it?

It all begins with education and awareness. In the weeks following the death of my son; my nurse told me, “These things usually don’t happen and especially not in the third trimester.” It was then that I knew education was lacking even in the medical field.

This realization was the start of my own awareness efforts. I started Aiden’s Wings of Awareness to bring forth awareness regarding pregnancy and infant loss and to educate others about how often it occurs, needlessly, in the United States each and every day. If even one life can be saved, it is worth every minute.  I challenge you to be your own advocate.

“Every life, no matter how fragile or brief, forever changes the world.”

Where Are The Health Professionals??

July 14, 2014 7 comments

by Lindsey Wimmer, RN, MSN, CPNP

My mind is still spinning from the incredible presentations and discussions at Stillbirth Summit 2014! There were a few ‘themes’ that emerged from the dialogue. Some were just questions that were asked more than once. One of those questions was

“Where Are The Health Professionals??”

Iabsent, too, was discouraged by the number of health professionals in attendance. To those that DID come – THANK YOU from the bottom of my heart.  For taking the time, committing to your littlest patients and their families, and engaging in discussions that hope to make a difference.  Your presence does so much good for the hearts of grieving families.
I know that providers are often concerned that patient-driven events are “sob fests” where they will hear one person’s tragic story after another. I believe there is much to be learned from events with that type of program. However – that isn’t what this conference is! A quick glance at the esteemed panel of presenters will prove that some of the stillbirth world’s brightest, most passionate, and most current researchers from around the world were here to work together and with all of us. I was so happy to hear from almost every health professional in attendance that this event was worth every minute of their time. Interestingly, they also asked the question about other health professionals. “Where are our colleagues?”
As a health professional myself, I have taken their ‘side’ many times in these discussions.
  • I understand that they are very busy people with many demands for their time and resources.
  • I understand that they really do want the best for their patients and don’t try to cause further heartache.
  • I understand that there are systematic challenges in how they are trained or receive updates through accepted channels (especially in the area of perinatal loss).
  • I understand they are often caught between their patients, the extended families, the hospitals, the law or other health policies, insurance companies, and other organizations.


I am also a stillbirth parent and I have grown very tired of the excuses and the platitudes. It’s hard for me to imagine health care professionals as a group being “ok” with 26,000 stillbirths every year in the United States alone! Yet, that is what parents hear when they are told that “sometimes these things just happen.” It’s hard for me to imagine a single health professional telling their patient that this loved child was a practice run. Yet, that is what thousands of parents hear when they are told that “we’ll do better next time”. It’s hard for me to imagine a health professional who was ok getting through medical school or nursing school or psychology training with “D” grades. Yet, that is what parents hear when they are told their provider followed the minimum standard of care.
 I’ve heard all the excuses.
  • Yes – stillbirth is a complicated subject.
  • Yes – stillbirth is under-researched and you need more data.
  • Yes – stillbirth is a difficult subject to talk about.
To me – these excuses point out all the reasons why you should want and demand more!
These are the reasons we (the families) want to work WITH you!
  • You are the people at the bedside when families are devastated with bad news.
  • You should want answers.
  • You should want more research.
  • You should want a dialogue that makes this subject easier to address.
  • You should want tools for prevention and tools for bereavement support.
  • These things would all make your job easier and reduce the number of families who endure these tragedies.
Get-involved-dude-image2The easy route is to wait on the sidelines and expect someone else to take leadership and create simple instructions. That is accepting status quo. And I expect better from the health professions. I am tired of defending health professionals who aren’t interested in defending their patients. There will be many more opportunities in the future to become involved. If you can’t wait – let me know and I can help you find a way to utilize your skills, expertise, and resources. Or – I can put you in touch with someone who can.

The time has come that if you aren’t willing to be part of the solution,

you are part of the problem.





Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,338 other followers

%d bloggers like this: